
Proposing a framework
I think proposing a framework could be useful and asking the user to share their stats might help, too. I'm inferring that they might be talking about the "European World Cup qualifiers" from 2023 for the 2026 World Cup, but there’s a risk in asserting details. It might be best to acknowledge the nominees and ask for specific rounds or results. I could suggest criteria like contribution, opponent strength, and key moments, alongside a simple scoring heuristic for comparisons.Crafting a structured response
I think we could ask the user for match stats or suggest a simple ranking method, like choosing a player based on a hat trick or comparing opponent rankings. It’s important to keep things concise. Given the user's use of Chinese, I can mirror that in my output.
I’ll propose criteria like direct stats, goal quality, opponent strength, and key moments. Then, I can provide a scoring table and possible conclusion rules for comparisons. Finally, I should ask them for specific data while offering a hypothetical example to keep things engaging.Establishing clear criteria
I think it’s best not to introduce new claims. Instead, I should focus on providing the user with clear criteria and quick heuristics. I can ask them for their stats and offer to compute a ranking based on that information. It might also be helpful to create a small snippet on how to apply these criteria if they share numbers. Since we’re working in a command-line interface (CLI), I’ll outline everything clearly to keep it manageable.
想聊评选吗?给我这一轮4人的具体数据(进球/助攻、是否点球、出场分钟、对手、比赛结果),我就按统一标准给出排名和理由。
简单评判框架(同场比较更公平):
- 直接贡献:非点球进球权重大于点球;制胜球额外加分;助攻与关键传球加分 
- 对手与场景:强队、客场、出线关键战的权重更高;垃圾时间进球权重更低
- 效率与作用:出场时间少但高效率、创造机会、主动压迫与参与防守
- 比赛影响:扳平/反超/绝杀的时序价值 > 垃圾时间补射
快速打分(你给我数据我来算):
- 非点球进球:+2 分;点球:+1 分
- 助攻:+1.5 分;制胜球:+1 分;强队/关键战:+0.5~1 分
- 关键时刻(扳平/反超/绝杀):每次 +0.5 分
- 出场<60 分钟且高转化:+0.5 分;大量浪费机会:-0.5 分
经验法则:
- 帽子戏法基本锁定最佳,除非对手极弱且多为点球 
- 双响+助攻通常胜过纯三点球
- 若数据接近,优先给到强对手、制胜贡献更高的那位
把这一轮四人的数据发我,我立刻按上述标准给出结论与排序。
.gif)